Profile: Zyxpsilon
Zyxpsilon
Male, 52, CANADA
Member Since:2/19/2006 10:12:12 PM
 
3 Articles Written
61 Comments Written
116 Referrals
 
Recent Articles

(Negative) abilities.

on 11/19/2007 1:50:52 PM
Would that make sense to some degree?The multiple handicaps (events, losing election, customized "numbers") come from within play - afterwards, when your race's destiny has been sealed up.Say, for example, a custom race has been defined with a --Minus […]

Techno pathways in variable init files.

on 11/25/2007 2:30:46 AM
Gimme a Governor/Type for automation of the entire tech-tree so i can concentrate on better things, please.I'm almost sure, somebody might have proposed this before. Let me add to the importance of it, then.I found myself in pretty steady patterns when it […]

Flat Space vs. Multi-level sectors.

on 11/11/2007 1:01:01 AM
** WARNING ** This suggestion would be for very high-end PCs only.Space is multi-directional, isn't it?Well, then, how come GC2 has a one plane map structure were its stars are layed-out evenly and accessible through straight paths (NSEW, cardinal points) […]
 
Recent Comments
yes there is a mod for neg abillitys it makes the game abit funner in my opinion.
Hmm what if the negative attributes COST you attribute point, rather then freed them but gave bonus points at the games end.
I wouldn't expect to see this in the base game, but Cari has fixed some bugs relating to negative abilities in TA so it should be more feasible via mods.
Yes, min-maxing is a valid concern. That's why I would propose only one 'tier' of negatives, not several like there are for boni. One tier would be enough to create an interesting racial background and free up some points without giving way to a Space Empires-like min-maxing game.

A lot of games have implemented this and I enjoy the feature but I am a rules munchkin.


This sort of encourages abusive min/maxing where you take as many negatives as possible in areas you had no intention of pursuing in the first place.

Don't ever negotiate? Take as many Diplomatic "handicaps" as possible. It won't make any difference anyway.